Saturday, August 03, 2002

Well, the criminal law exam is over. I think it went well enough, although I can always think of a few things I should have included. Perhaps those few things were vital, but they probably weren't.

The work on the novel proceeds. Still haven't got past plotting and outlining - I worry that I'm trapped in minutiae, but I also worry that, if I don't take care of establishing certain ground rules, the novel will be full of gaping plot holes and inconsistencies. So many novels are, these days. I have that scientific sort of mind that wants to ask authors vastly annoying questions like "So.....how do you explain thermoregulation in the undead?" Much of the time, novelists gloss over these issues - they probably never thought these issues needed explanation. Perhaps they think their audience is too stupid or uneducated to understand what thermoregulation is? I'm not entirely happy with that answer. Perhaps many authors don't know what thermoregulation is themselves? I can understand the "avoid the topic" mentality for highly problematic issues, but basic biology and physiology should be at least consistent, if not entirely scientific. I always thought it was fun to figure out how magical systems in fantasy novels work, but it disappoints me so when something totally new and off the wall is thrown in without explanation. That's no fun - what's the point of having a system you violate whenever it is slightly inconvenient or you're not feeling very creative. Laziness.

Then again, going to the opposite extreme is pretty dull, too. I find myself getting bored when reading complicated pseudo-science explanations, or is that justifications, of how warp drives work or how transposons will cause humans to mutate into another species. Pedantic.

I believe the happy medium is, as usual, the best solution. One should have a logical, well-thought out basis for the mythos, physiology, etc. of your universe/planet/species/monster/whatever, but not share it with the reader ad nauseum until s/he regrets having the ability for rational thought. Share just enough to give the reader hints so they can figure it out, if they want to. If they don't care, you'll just be boring them with the tedious details. By consistently following the scheme you develop and dropping the appropriate hints, the story's system will be "logical" even if it is scientifically improbable. Then again, it is possibly a waste of time. Most of best-selling novels have plot holes the size of Texas...plot and characterization have been reduced to tools used to move the action along when it lags.

I also worry that I haven't really had a chance to do much creative writing since grade school. I was good at it then...but I wonder if I'll be continually slipping back into essay style, which now predominates the majority of my literary output. Not good for dialogue, essay style. Getting some practice writing freely is part of the logic behind keeping this journal. As you probably see, I'm reasonably good at flow-of-consciousness writing, but that's even worse. Have you ever read any Beckett or Joyce? Ugh! You'll never catch *me* waiting for Godot, thank you very much. My biggest challenge so far has been abandoning formal essay yet keeping to a structured plan. A writer of extremes, that's me - either all organization, or none whatsoever. Let's see, I have an idea. I'm good at writing about me, I think my next experiment will be to internalize all characters and write about them as if they were me. Well, I'm off to try this grand experiment. More later.

Thursday, August 01, 2002

One day left until my first law school exam. Criminal law, I feel reasonably well prepared. I haven't written in my journal for a while, I've been busy with school stuff. Took the GRE and did well, busy shepherding all the necessary paperwork for the graduate admissions process for the M.A. in International Relations. Been writing a bit of fiction, well, plotting and character sketches, in my free time. Not much interesting will be happening until after I finish the final.

Wednesday, July 17, 2002

Well, I've made some progress on my home page although it meant neglecting my criminal law book for a day. I've updated my home page and my links page. I'm pretty happy with the new home page - looks a lot spiffier, overall, than the old version, and contains some cute Flash elements. I'm fairly proud of my animated buttons - visual creativity isn't my strongest skill, writing being my creative outlet of choice, so I'm fairly proud whenever I achieve anything visually creative that isn't utterly laughable. I'm fairly tired and I see that my sentences are getting slightly incoherent and rambling, so time to sign off.

Quote:
Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggy" until you can find a rock.

Tuesday, July 16, 2002

Well, this is my first entry in my Blogger thingy. I've always thought it would be neat to keep an on-line journal - or a journal, period - but time being what it is, I never had enough to get around to it. Right now I need to go read twenty pages for Criminal Law class tonight and I register to take the GRE . I need to get my GRE scores to the International Relations M.A. program within the month so I can get accepted into the dual degree J.D./M.A. program for fall semster. Ok, off to class.

Quote:
There appears to be a large hedge moving towards us...
That's not a hedge, counsel - that's the Scots!
- Blackadder: Back and Forth